Comparison of a novel sonic toothbrush to standard brushing and flossing on clinical signs of inflammation: A randomized clinical trial
Objective
To determine the effectiveness of the Waterpik™ Sonic-Fusion™ in reducing plaque and clinical signs of inflammation compared with standard brushing and flossing.
Methodology
This was a randomised, controlled, parallel clinical trial. Thirty-five subjects were enrolled in each group.
-
Group 1: Waterpik Sonic-Fusion — participants brushed for two minutes and flossed for one minute.
-
Group 2: ADA standard toothbrush and dental floss.
Gingival health was assessed using Bleeding on Probing (BOP) and the Modified Gingival Index (MGI) at baseline, two weeks, and four weeks.
Plaque levels were evaluated using the Rustogi Modification of the Navy Plaque Index (RMNPI) at the same intervals.
All participants received written and verbal instructions for correct use.
Results
Both the Sonic-Fusion and traditional brushing and flossing groups demonstrated significant reductions in plaque, BOP, and MGI from baseline to four weeks (p < 0.001).
However, the Waterpik Sonic-Fusion group was more than twice as effective as the standard brushing and flossing group across all measures.
Conclusion
The Waterpik Sonic-Fusion is more than twice as effective as traditional brushing and flossing for removing plaque and improving gingival health, providing a superior solution for comprehensive oral hygiene.